|
Irrigation Using a "phytomonitoring"
System
Experiment in Pepper Plants of
Lorca and Parker
Eviatar Itiel,
Yoram Zvieli - Negev Extension
Service, Ministry of Agriculture
and Rural Development Rivka
Offenbach, Rami Golan - Arava
R&D Center Aharon Barda,
Moshav Tzofar
Summary
Pepper plants
of Lorca and Parker varieties
were grown in a commercial 25
mesh net-house in Moshav Tzofar.
Phytomonitoring system ('Phytech'
Company, Yad Mordechai) was
installed in two irrigation
treatment plots in
mid-September, 2002: a) the
control "Commercial" treatment
in which the grower, based on
his experience, made the water
application decisions, and b)
the "Phytech" treatment in which
application decisions were made
based on the analysis of the
readings of the system's various
sensors.

Beginning mid-October one
could detect, based on sensors'
night readings, VPD values that
caused transpiration during
night hours. (VPD = vapor
pressure deficit - the
difference between vapor
pressure under saturation and
the one actually measured.) In
fact, based on these findings,
the "Phytech" treatment received
only night irrigations from
mid-October till mid-March.
The number and timing of
irrigations in the "Phytech"
plots was determined based on
the stem diameter sensor
fluctuation readings in the
Parker pepper.
|
The
"Phytech"
treatment yielded
33% and 15% higher
than the
"Commercial"
treatment for Parker
and Lorca varieties,
respectively. |
This increase
in yield fits the results
obtained in a similar trial
carried out a year earlier in
the Lorca variety. There was
only slight increase in the
exportable percentage, since
most of the additional yield
consisted of deformed fruit
(reason unknown) disqualified
for export. Aside from this
problem, night irrigation had no
negative effects on fruit
quality parameters including
cracking, and this contrary to
the common opinion on the
negative effect of night
irrigation on fruit cracking.
Considering the big demand of
irrigation water in the dry hot
season and the insufficient
supply of water during the day
time, night irrigation can
greatly ease day-time water
supply and distribution
"bottle-necks" common in summer
days in Moshav Tzofar.
Introduction, and Trial Aims
Last season, the pepper area
grown under net-houses in the
Arava Valley and Kikar Sedom was
4,700 dunam (470 hectare),
accounting for 60% of all pepper
grown in the region.
The
micro-climate pervading inside a
net-house is different from that
inside a plastic-film covered
greenhouse. There are autumn and
winter nights in the Arava in
which the VPD values rise and
the plant loses of its water. To
the extent the plant enters the
morning following with a water
deficit, it loses growth ability
(see diagram 1). Setting the
irrigation timing based on the
phytomonitoring system, enables
detecting such a situation in
the plants through sensing stem
diameter response to morning
irrigation: if response as
measured in stem swelling is
large, it means there was a
noticeable night moisture
deficit.
There is also a
clear technical advantage to
night irrigation related to the
water distribution limitations
in Moshav Tzofar, where the
system is over-loaded during
day-time. Moreover, there are
growers without water-strorage
capacity who are forced to
irrigate partially at night.
Studying the effects of night
irrigations is therefore
important.
Methods and Materials
Pepper plants of Parker and
Lorca varieties were planted in
a net-house on 2 August 2002 on
the Barda farm in Moshav Tzofar.
There were two irrigation
treatments planned: a) the
control "Commercial" treatment
in which the grower, based on
his best knowledge and
experience, made the water
application decisions, and b)
the "Phytech" treatment in which
application decisions were made
based on the analysis of the
readings of the system's various
sensors. Forty five days after
planting the Phytomonitoring
sensors were put in place,
showing no reason to change the
irrigation regime at that time.
Based on sensor readings, the
"Phytech" treatment was split
from the "Commercial" one
mid-October. Two beds for each
variety X treatment were
designated making for a total of
8 beds.
Representative
plants in each of the two Parker
variety "Phytech" treatment
plots were monitored by means of
phytomonitoring sensors of
"Phytech" Company of Yad
Mordechai.
The plant
sensors included a stem diameter
monitor, a leaf-sap flow
monitor, a leaf temperature
monitor and a fruit diameter
monitor. Environmental and soil
sensors were also installed -
measuring radiation, air
temperature, relative humidity
and soil moisture.
As discussed above, for each
variety two beds were selected
for the "Phytech" treatment, on
which the exact same irrigation
regime was applied. Two yield
sampling plots were marked in
each bed, making for a total of
16 harvest plots - four for each
treatment x variety. The fruit
harvested was sorted and weighed
in nearby Yair research station.
The plots in fact do not
constitute true replications
since they could not be
designated randomly. Results are
therefore presented as averages
only, without analysis of
variance.
Results
and Discussion
In relatively dry nights in
which vapor pressure deficit
(VPD) values can rise to quite a
high level, night transpiration
can account for 10% of total
24-hour day transpiration
(Moreshet et al. 1999). The same
work showed that rising night
VPD values stops small fruit
growth.
The results obtained (table 1) show a definite trend of
increased total yield and number
of fruits in the "Phytech"
treatment in both pepper
varieties, compared to the
control. This increase began
with early December harvests
(diagram 2) in Parker var, while
only in late March in Lorca var.
This increase in both total
yield and fruit number did
hardly at all, however, result
in increased exportable fruit
(actually lowering exportable
fruit percentage). The reason
for this decrease in exportable
fruit percentage in both
varieties was due to the
increased (doubled) number of
deformed fruit, a phenomenon
which began with December
pickings in Parker (see diagram
3) and with end January pickings
in Lorca. An explanation for
this phenomenon could not be
found so far.
It is
commonly thought that night
irrigation induces fruit
cracking in tomato and pepper
(Moreshet et al., 1999).
However, in two years of night
irrigation no effect on fruit
cracking was observed at all.
Diagram 1. Rate of change
in stem diameter and VPD, in
night- and day- irrigation
regimes

Table 1. Yield components
in irrigation regime trial for
pepper using Phytech
phytomonitoring system
|
variety |
irrigation treatment |
total yield
kg/sq.m. |
number fruit - total
fruit/sq.m |
ave. fruit weight
grams |
export yield kg/sq.m. |
number fruit,
exportable
fruit/sq.m. |
average exp. fruit
weight - grams |
number fruit deformed
fruit/sq.m |
|
Lorca |
control |
8.1 |
51 |
156 |
6.0 |
28 |
210 |
12 |
|
Lorca |
phytech |
9.3 |
60 |
154 |
5.9 |
28 |
204 |
20 |
|
Parker |
control |
8.1 |
44 |
181 |
5.1 |
23 |
215 |
12 |
|
Parker |
phytech |
10.9 |
75 |
143 |
5.8 |
29 |
199 |
38 |
Total Yield
Lorca Lorca
Parker Parker
Total Fruit |
 |
control Phytech
control Phytech
Number |
|